Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Reasons for the Tribunal's Decision on the Place of Arbitration

7 Aug 2000
Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL
View case details
Reasons for the Tribunal's Decision on the Place of Arbitration
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Reasons for the Tribunal's Decision on the Place of Arbitration
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
J. William Rowley
Respondent appointee
Warren Christopher
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Christopher F. Dugan, Claudia Callaway, Alexander W. Koff, Sabina Rose Smith, Matthew S. Dunne, Paul Hastings
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
William H. Taft V., Ronald J. Bettauer, Mark A. Clodfelter, Barton Legum, Andrea J. Menaker, David A. Pawlak, Jennifer I. Toole, CarrieLyn D. Guymon, Mark S. McNeill, Department of State of the United States
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Reasons for the Tribunal's Decision on the Place of Arbitration
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.